A Face in The Darkness.

The great faces of cinema are sometimes stagnant. They barely move, they never shift even after they no longer inhabit our great earth. They live on in celluloid untouched by time, a representation of the divine work at play in the singular creation of each of us. Sometimes these faces are so singular they become the actors signature, almost the reason for hire, the character of the character. Lorre, Bette Davis and her eyes, Brad Dourif, Willem Dafoe, Linda Hunt. And then you have those whose faces represent the stock and trade of Hollywood, singular beauty, not necessarily models, but beautiful and singular nonetheless; Joan Crawford, Gene Tierney, Al Pacino, and Daniel Day Lewis. Faces that are always centered, but in one or two movies -like their counterparts become the character of the character, such is the case of Daniel Day Lewis in Paul Thomas Anderson’s tale of American Industry and faith come destroy the Garden of Eden - “There Will be Blood”. In it, Day’s face becomes the movie, a great deterioration of stature and beauty. Busyness for the sake of itself. Great movements that quake with fury from hatreds built up over time, a face for America indeed. It starts out as a strong face, impertinent, rustic, the mustache a perfectly symmetrical compliment to the coming of two staunch eyebrows above it, under which sit an eagles eyes, with a beak of a nose to match. The hat gives him, purpose, sells his story and everything with Daniel Plainview is a story, likely one of his own concoction. Much like his country of birth, and the story of Eli Sunday’s God, Daniel is not big on details around his birth, nor much of his growing up, which seems painful enough for him to ignore (again a spiritual connection with America ) all together by way of complete silences or “I don't want to talk about those things”. The film doesn't invade because the opaque nature of where Daniel came from is the point, not only in the sense that mysterious background serves as a propulsion for every foul deed within him, but in a religious sense that like his spiritual analogues devil or christ, he arrives in the story somewhat out of nowhere, his origin as if he always existed, born out of industry and fire. If in essence this story can be boiled down to a battle for the soul of this nation between one of industry and one of the church at the turn of the century, these forces come into our play already living as God and the devil came into our knowledge having existed rather than having been born, because it is not their history we are really interested in but our own. Lewis’s face so clear, so pure, in the beginning slowly becomes less and less understandable, less and less readable. What he wants always obfuscated by loud violences and operatic movement. By the end the hat is gone and so is his purpose, he merely sits around his palace the only remaining reminder of his empire -his legacy, shot up and empty, hollow and dark, shooting at unseen targets, enemies both foreign and domestic, drinking himself into stupidity. His hair wet and lazy, his face now a swamp rather than the firm terrain that once occupied the space around his eyes. A void moreso than a man, Daniel Day’s face repels us, as he chews a steak now more brick than meat, still clinging to this signs of virility even as Lewis shakes and waddles his body to the point each step looks as if it is the preamble for a great toppling over. It's a rather sad and pathetic thing to watch, even as we have been witness to all the evil that led to this decayed state. Again much like Plainview’s country of birth.

DDL’s performance is both granular and angular, spectacle and ostentation, the only subtleties he leaves are for Plainview’s various fits with his own humanity left behind in his ambitious pursuit of vainglorious manifest destiny. It needs be that these things all exist for Daniel Plainview is no lover of man, far from it, the man despises every interaction. Every word out of his mouth is a boldface lie, from his repetitious statement of his affinity for plain-speaking - to his affected vocal inflections, not merely ornament for a shrine to Daniel Day Lewis’s greatness and skill, but fully in service of his character as a man made whole cloth of the collective imagination of the American power and virile masculinity. But the lie in and of itself is a bit of an affect, because what Daniel Plainview betrays in words, and Daniel Day Lewis in body language and eye contact, is a deep need for the very bonds he so furiously burrows in and destroys. Plainview is a man in search of validation, of family, maybe even of something to believe in, or else why would be blister so at those men who paid him no mind, who sit at tables together presumably minding their own business? Even while clearly these men did indeed look to pay Plainview out , to them it was merely part of the game, but to Daniel it was personal insult and rejection, and their slightly intentional slight about his boy - mostly an angle to persuade Daniel of their logic - produces such an outrageous fit precisely because family means so much to Daniel, and the the guilt of sending HW away knawed at his very soul because he saw in him family. Daniel's relationship with H.W. is one born out of guile, but by then one made of real connection. Years of play have confused poor Daniel. He is an actor stuck in a role, a cop deep undercover who starts to confuse the lines, because they were always bit hazy in the first place. When H.W. gets hurt in the rig incident Daniel Day Lewis frets over him with genuine passion, hurriedly, excitedly, pleading with H.W. to tell him where it hurts. It’d be the most tender scene in the film if not for a subsequent scene where he and H.W. lay on floor in almost embryonic embrace, Daniel softly stroking his hands through H.W.’s bushel of soft black-lace hair as H.W. hums desperately to hear his own voice as he has gone deaf as a result of the accident. This is the second guilt Daniel feels if one like me, argues that to some extent he took H.W. in out of some (exotic to Plainview) sense of guilt, a sense of shame about the accidental death of H.W.’s father. The third guilt is sending H.W. away because he cannot deal with his handicap, his weakness, which is an affront to Daniel, which shows in his lack of patience, and his focus into his work, and more importantly serves as a reminder that H.W. is in fact not his. When he abandons H.W. on that train Daniel Day Lewis's hurries off as if he's had to walk through a gauntlet hammered by his own guilt. His gait largely affected by the blows, his face much like that hole in the ground geysing up pressure and lubrication. His face trembles and twist as he furiously fights back the wells eruption, even then his masculinity ossified in its own obsession, can cede little ground, and it’s devastatingly effective acting by Daniel Day Lewis once again powered by his face. It is near providence then that at this very time he had found a long lost brother, “Henry Plainview”, whose arrival makes H.W. equal parts suspicious and jealous - and yet more evidence of Daniel’s need for familial bonds, his secret longing for some connection, to be seen and understood by someone other than himself. “Well if it's in me it's in you”, “At times I look at other people and I see nothing worth liking”, said in extreme close up, Daniel’s face half drenched in darkness, though just enough to see the earnest desire for some relation and by consequence relationship, and then his sadness at the next thought about his inability to connect. Lewis alternates between an empty vessel hollowed and full of cold dead air, and then softness, (both mostly seen in his glistening eyes) and then pained suffering. When “Henry” asks him what he will do about his son, he tosses his head back and takes a swig from his cantine of alcohol so full of tension it seems his head might cave in, and when he comes back down he lets the alcohol sit in his mouth burning his cheeks full, finally gusting out all of the air that question took up. A beat, and then “I don't know”. “Maybe it'll change, does your sound come back to you? I don't know” Lewis's eyes half pleading. “Where's his mother?” asks Henry, Plainview goes silent DDL contorts his face (a sure sign of confoundment) one eyebrow raised, the other shifting, until eventually teeth show, clenched, if not bared, hurting if not angered. The scene is arguably the most honest Plainview will be in the movie, the most self aware for sure, and Daniel Day Lewis meets the moment with such frightening brilliance it challenges the alabaster eerieness of Sir Anthony Hopkins most unsightly line readings of Hannibal Lecter in “Silence of the Lambs”. “Having you here gives me a second breath, I can't keep doing this alone with these ..People” is a hideous thing to see, one of the ugliest I've ever seen on celluloid. Quiet as the scene is, subtle as DDL is, it is quite loud with its animus. Daniel's face, the truth in it, of it, the scariest part by the margins between North and South poles. There's a resolutness to Daniel’s expression when he says “I can't keep doing this alone, that reinforces the brief moment of contentment in his previous statement; “Having you here gives me a second breath of life”. These set the table for the absolute nature of the breakdown when he says “People”. As he speaks the word a smile comes across his face, it's one of miles and miles and miles of paved disgust, the same strange mixture of self loathing and fiendish bemusement one might see from a child burning ants with a magnifying glass. In that moment it becomes clear just how alien and apart from humanity Daniel Plainview, and Daniel Day Lewis's face are becoming, arguably the movies most powerful and resonant instance of Mise-en-scène. These two scenes, Daniel’s brief abandonment of H.W., and this sharing of some of his most guarded thoughts, his truest face, with his fake brother, the former taking place almost right after the latter, foreshadow Daniel’s destruction, which is mostly shown to us by way of the rapid devolution of Daniel Day Lewis's face.

If Carl Dreyer's “The Passion of Joan of Arc” could be seen as director Michael Mann once said; “ The human experience conveyed purely from the visualisation of the human face: no one else,” I might argue that “There Will Be Blood” is the inverse or rather a conversion; an alien experience conveyed purely from the visualization of the human face, and everything else. Everything about “There Will Be Blood” is affected, and keeps us at a distance distinctive to the pov of its subject. It is the story of a country, by way of the story of one of its gods, the titan of industry, who as titans are prone to do - eats his children, murders brethren, and finds itself at odds with all creation. The farther up Daniel ascends the less his face looks or acts natural. His baptism is his damnation, as his sworn enemy (Eli Sunday) in the garden of Eden defiles him, the shame of misdeeds are brought to bear on his face. The lips begin to quiver, then creak, the brows begin to wrench, and squirm from this unbearable truth, until all erupt into confession, Daniel Day’s eyes burning through his own flesh, the last remnants of his humanity almost as dead as his brother who had been revealed to be his last revelation and his apocalypse. He didn't understand much about humanity (his own or ours) when he first stared down at orphaned infant H.W. , Lewis’s face full befuddlement and curiosity, unsure of what to do next, - he understands it less now, and worse still, he has given up on it. The last remaining bits drive him to drink, the drink drives him to fury. Try as he may he is now fully and only an oil man, as oil is now his family, his validation, his connection to this world, and his faith. Now fully converted to the Saul of Tarsus moment when he raised his hand to the sun full of black gold, the blood of his Christ, he begins his descent into its depths. His face becomes oily, his stubble becomes permanent, his hair slick, his hat gone, his eyes sunken, he is awakened by Eli for one last vengeance, one last act of hate. One eye looks half closed from a lifetime of glaring, and when it is open when both are open there is nothing there, Lewis seems almost possessed. In one Daniels possession, the other Daniel is sacrilegious, and his expressions are saturated in absurdity; “I drink from the blood of the Bandy tract!”. The more Eli shows his own sad sack pathetic humanity, the less interested in it Daniel becomes, the more he wants to destroy it, destroy him. “DRAAAAAAAAIIIIIIIINAAAAAAGE!!'“ Lewis bounces and heaves, invades Dano’s space and provokes with his sweaty eyelids even from side profile. When it is all said and then done, and the blood drains from Eli’s empty head, all that is truly left is his face, but we can no longer see it. It is no longer worth the effort, he is still metaphorically staring in the darkness at that oil burning in the night sky, the moment he saw his future, maybe, his death. “Im finished”, he calls out to his servant, the shot is from the back, a wide, the whole of it on display, The Devil and the Devil, God and God, both false, both dead , both drained. Daniel is done, and Daniel is done.