Sean Connery was The Man and The Myth.

The-15-greatest-Sean-Connery-films.jpg

Very few actors had what Sean Connery had in the way he had. Very few could get away with it. Connery like another one of my favorite actors George Sanders should probably be thankful he was born in the era he was, where the anonymity of celebrity, and the mystery of their inner lives allowed them to miss almost completely any compelling challenges to their actual personhood. It was a type of peace actors today could not enjoy, and in cases like Connery should not. Connery was the type of man that lived in the rarified air of the myth. One of those figures that like John Wayne, or Clint Eastwood seemed to actually be the men they portrayed on screen. Wayne was the Cowboy, Eastwood the quintessential “Tough guy", Connery's particular myth was the Warrior Scholar. The well studied, well travelled man of action. Resolute in action, sturdy, analytical, and quick on his feet. He was best suited for so many warrior scholar roles because he exuded exactly those qualities. Warrior scholars hold a very mythological place in our society because in many ways they are myths. A realistic example of them in life is extremely rare. They have a dichotomy of approaches that rarely congeal. Upon further interrogation they rarely stand up to the idea of them in our heads. The analytical and action oriented being who measurebly enacts not necessarily with balance but with prudence when the time for either should be is mostly the consequence of storytelling. The archetype has endeared itself to us through masters of story and legend by way of representing two of the qualities we admire most in people especially in our men, wisdom, and strength. So that when as Dr. Henry Jones Connery decisively crowns his own son across the head mistakenly, and then expresses regret for what he has ( also mistakenly) believed was a prized artifact we all go “wow…what a man” even if not in any way that is spoken. …

But again it’s fair to ask does the Warrior Scholar truly exist in the way we see them? These men who always know instinctively when to act and when to analyze in a way that appeals to the most upstanding virtues in ourselves. Apparently not. Connery was accused of abuse in her memoir by ex-wife Diane Cilento both mentally and physically, and in all those years where was the analysis of situation then? Where was society's, especially other men? Later when asked about his distasteful comments about abuse he doubled down and didn't back off one bit. His explanation is horrific, and lacks analysis of even the most banal sort. It’s the kind born of the audacity of not only an individual, but an age. Make no mistake thinking this entrenched is always backed up by a body of thought, and yet when we are honest with ourselves we find some of that “body" in us. Our society not only allowed, but celebrated Connery as he would appeal to this sentiment many times over his career as Bond, and if not directly, implicitly in films that range from the Lion in Winter to The Anderson Tapes ( One of my faves) and then even more as he grew older in The Highlander and The Untouchables. It’s not just about physical violence it’s the mindset that seems to not even desire to question the harm. There’s no empathy, because there is no analysis, no analysis because that’s hesitation, that’s pause. Connery could look the scholar, feel it, but he didnt really understand it, it was a concept to him. In the latter of the last two films I mentioned ( The Untouchables) Connery is in rare form. As Malone, he is a street scholar, a man that understands the guttural heart beat of a cruel city. A man that knows the streets, and understands the mentality of the gangster while fully being dedicated to the law, the type that would sooner laugh at a scholar, a thinker, because he is a doer. This is not only fool-hardy, its copaganda, but its myth and Connery understands the power of it, and we believe Connery exactly because he’s so damn sure he’s right he assures us. Elliott Ness (or at least Costner’s and DePalmas idealized version of this actually very mediocre person ) is all innocence and uncertainty, but Connery's Malone is all worldliness and confidence. He knows he’s right even when hes wrong. Hes seen it all, done it all, so what’s the point of thinking about it, ACTION! “You’ve got to take action SON! Stop thinking about what’s right and worrying about your precious morality and ACT!” That’s the sum of what hes saying here. Connery fills it and almost all his roles with this mythical confidence, this complete lack of doubt in his words this power, this virility, and truth, not objective truth mind you, because that’s not what he's going for, hell it doesn't matter that this is complete bullshit, Connery gives it the ring of truth by being true to the man, the myth that is Malone, there is no contemplation in Connery and there is none in Malone as to why he is, he just is…Connery was nominated for his first and only Oscar …

The Untouchables movie clips: http://j.mp/1BcPG9X BUY THE MOVIE: http://amzn.to/sW4EVr Don't miss the HOTTEST NEW TRAILERS: http://bit.ly/1u2y6pr CLIP DESCRI...


The truth is most of Connerys best roles occupied this exact space, a space made all that much more believable because in real life he occupied this same mythical space. A member of The Royal Navy, an accomplished soccer player, a body builder, who also read works by Tolstoy, Proust, Ibsen, and Joyce, I mean c'mon, the man’s real life resume read like one of those 80s /90s action heroes, in fact his own John Patrick Mason in Michael Bay's “The Rock". This is the framework that made possible the aesthetic belief of Connery the screen legend, but the intrinsic belief came by way of skill, and presence. Connery had a simple but extremely effective and organic way of putting, placing , or saying things that reminded one of a warrior. Miyamoto Musashi- a famed Warrior who was also a philosopher - had what could be seen as a disdain for hesitation for doubt. He and others felt “be quick to action but graceful and poetic”, it was a common refrain and his code, Yamamoto Tsunetomo’s as well. Connery embodied this spirit to the point even some of us who knew better let him pass as a world travelled Egyptian who picked up much of these warrior ethics along the way. John Patrick Mason, one of his most prominent characters molded in this visage was also one of his few escapes from this, it’s where Connery proves hes adept at vulnerability, and had he continued down this path it would’ve been profoundly interesting to see what he found. In “The Rock” Mason skillfully, and rather comically escapes the grasp of the FBI who seeks to use him as a pawn in their desire to get rid of an undesirable, and his first and only desire is to make contact with his estranged daughter. While telling her of his plans to try and build a relationship they’ve never had, Connery makes Mason unsteady but not hesitant, each word each thought has a rhythm, a bassline, even while the man himself is slightly unsure. This is courage, and it is grace, and it is extremely masculine and yet it is also a dash of the feminine. For a moment..the unknown in Connery makes an appearance, and when I say moment and dash, I do mean a dash and moment. For the entire scene his eyes have the Eastwoodian glare, that centrality of purpose, that “Oh so Male” sureity, while the body reveals the doubt beneath, but the moment he begins to utter the words “Jade I’m not an evil man..” they soften to reveal a depth of vulnerability rarely seen in Connery but severely wanted, because he wants this. It's something we’ve rarely if ever seen in Connery…desperation. We won’t see it again for much of the film, but it is enough and it all Connery needed.

This kind of unabashed appeal to masculinity is rarely tolerated these days , (and for the record I don't know that it should be) and those that have it (The Rock, Schwarzenegger, Stallone) , are usually completely unable to pull off the scholarly factor. One of the few actors that could shared the screen with him as his son ..Harrison Ford was one of the few, but Ford was always more vulnerable, more penetrable than Connery allowed, this is why it was so believable that Connery was intimidating father figure to Ford. Ford was an everyman that could be anything including scrappy and scholarly himself, but it was that new sense of vulnerability that he and later others "(Bruce Willis, Keanu Reeves) brought to the new hero that made Ford appear directly susceptible to the men they came from, the men like Connery they may have idolized. It was truly one of the more perfect castings ever put to screen. As a side note this is one of the reasons I was so disgusted by the rumor of Chris Pratt as the next Indiana Jones. Pratt's sore and total lacking in that all important scholar quality. Sure he could pull off being a smart ass, and scrappy, but a scholar? Indie sure, Dr Jones?? Not on your life. Pratts whole schtick is based on no one including him believing a word he says, it doesn't work putting him on positions of authority or intelligence. It tells us how far we come regarding our sensibilities about our heroes and also that not all forms of vulnerability and willingness to be unsure are equal, and when faced with the decision to choose between complete doubt in what you say or do, and complete belief in something that could or might be completely ridiculous, I think we’ve all at some point shown where we stand. It is in all this that I find that Connery was both statuesque and classic. Both a representation of the sturdiness of nostalgia and a relic of a by gone era. He tapped out just at the right time leaving us with the picture of the actor and the flawed and at times villain that was the man. We should remember both , not just for posterity, but because it encompassed and informed the work. What made Sean Connery Sean Connery was that he got through his life and work with no hesitancy and a definitive decidedness, that should be praised in his work and cautioned and chastised against in his and anyone’s life, and that is the fallacy of the man and the legend of the actor.

Revisit: The Unmitigated Brilliance of Bridesmaids and Kristen Wiig.

Kristen-Wiig-in-Bridesmaids.jpg

If I were to have made a list of the best films of the 2010's Bridesmaids would be on it. It’s a movie that drew comparisons to Todd Phillips “The Hangover” , but this was a very superficial connection. Todd Phillips is a very immature director and I mean that in the classical, traditional sense. His films always feel far too driven by impulses with little composure, edge for the sake of itself. The things that happened in the hangover films felt like they came from a point of view, or direction that was like “Michael Keaton egging The Joker on in Tim Burton's “Batman”. “You wanna get crazy?! Lets get crazy!!” Its message and approach to male bonding is basic, juvenile, and much like “Joker” over simplified and barely connected to the story, as in it feels like watching those very violent Saturday morning cartoons like G.I. Joe that had the little message at the end where they said something like “Stay in school,” followed by “Yoooooo JOE!” ...at that point who cares. Bridesmaids is actually from beginning to ending about the absurdity of expectations, the ones we put on ourselves, on our growth, on our relationships, the shit we get ourselves into because of it, and how to step out of it. It's emotionally authentic, and mature, and even the ancillary characters have motivations that feel rooted in truth as well as farce. This is an incredibly thematically acrobatic and difficult feat, one this film accomplishes with an ease similar to 1984's Ghostbusters. Along those same lines, for many of those same reasons, if I were to pick the best scenes of this past decade, the airplane scene from this film would also be amongst the best. It's outrageous, it's temperamental, its hilarious, and it’s phenomenally structured…

The scene is the pinnacle of Bridesmaid's genius.  It’s edited brilliantly to show an upward staircase of unhinged anxiety. Cuts from one part of the plane to another are slowly but surely increased with a frequency that increases as each member becomes more frantic, until it spreads and pops. No one is trying to upstage anyone. Ellie Kemper and Wendi McLendon-Covey could almost form their own movie based off the conversation, improvisation, and chemistry they construct and erect in this scene. Melissa McCarthy is off on a quest for the holy grail of focused zaniness, Rose Byrne's giving a smug smarmy sermon from the book of comedy revelations, and Maya Rudolph is just there trying to keep it all together in a straight man role that shows off her range, and her intellectual, instinctual understanding of comedy. Everyone is on 10, actually no.. Spinal Tap's “11”. But Kristen Wiig, my God Wiig. I've seen this movie several times,  and it was still INCREDIBLY hard to watch this without losing it the entire time. It's small things like in the interaction between her and the (actually great) flight attendant when she puts the shades on. He confronts her, and with an overload of wispy caricature, Wiig simply replies “Ummm no". To big large obvious things like "There's a colonial woman on the wing!”.

It is one of the most farcical and hilarious things I've heard in my life , I can just sit and think on it over and over again and laugh forever. There are levels to it, the first being you recognize the reference (The famous Twilight Zone episode) which already (at least with me) puts a smile on my face. Then she takes it somewhere you wouldn't expect in a million years, ( She was churning butter, I saw her!”) and yet, if you think about the context of the anxiety,  and what it is she might ultimately be afraid, where this comes from, what the institution of marriage, and the expectations anchired to it - it makes pretty damn good sense.  Then there's the commitment to the idea, to resonance, to some true objective with every comedian but Wiig just seems to find levels under the pre-existing levels contorting her face, twisting her mind to slip past the boundaries. Here she ultimately mines a similar level of paranoia as displayed in Shatner's episode.  "There's something they're not telling us!" is the encapsulation of the terror in the seminal Twilight Zone episode, but funneled through Wiig's energetic, frantic, ridiculousness, it gets me every time. Wiig is so connected to every action, every word no matter how far out they are- it bends reality.  With Will Ferrell (who in his prime was also incredibly brilliant to me ) I laughed knowing the farce.  Knowing it couldn't happen,  wouldn't happen,  with Wiig, (because she's always adds a dash of genuine emotion)  right at the site of where the seed of the absurd will grow - I laugh because I believe it could,  despite knowing the likelihood. 

Two amazing Women, Johnny Gill and my writer's block.


I recently started writing again after a good six or so month "break". it was really more-so a break down caused by the intense feelings of stagnation and overall unremarkableness of my life so far, never mind that during that time nothing on TV or film moved me to write, and when those that did would appear, I'd be in the middle of working on a piece about them, see someone else write something better on the matter I was writing on, in a very similar fashion, and be like.."There you go....unremarkable". Comparison truly is the thief of joy…

giphy (2).gif



I promise this is not a pity party, and in actuality I not only know I’m a damn good writer, I know I belong here . I am no more bereaved at this than New Edition losing Bobby Brown and gaining You guessed it ..Johnny Gill. I just believe quite plainly that there is a point where a subject has been covered, and that it’s okay to say sometimes “Hey, they see this more clearly than I have and there is no need to expound any further”. The opposite of this belief in my mind gives rise to insidious behavior like man-splaining. The loss of joy is in actuality over the loss of my artistic child, given up for adoption to a parent who proved they could better care for it than I could at the time. I assure you most days when I don’t look at it sternly in the face. When it doesn't all hit me at once I'm pretty fucking happy with my life, my acting (when I get to act), my writing, and with myself. Most days I like me. I like the way I think, the way I dress, look, commune, and most importantly the way I empathize with others. Which is integral to my writing which I happen to think is pretty damn good. The prophets once said “Sunny Days, everybody loves them but tell me can you stand the rain”. The fact that I am able to empathize with people whose point of view may irk me, (like people who say”Denzel is pretty much the same in all his movies” or who reduce Quentin Tarantino to his use of the N word in movies) people with whom I may not f*** with on any “real” level , don’t abhor, but rather don’t see eye to eye with - It's probably my favorite part of me. That little voice in my head that says "Well you know, think about it from the their point of view", when I'm in my head cursing someone's name for some sin or the other against me, or done in the general vicinity of my nerves. That voice keeps me honest, humbles me, and gives me my best perspective by challenging me to challenge my own ideas. I digress...funny enough this post isn’t about me, it's about the two people that helped lift me out of my slump without lifting a hand..by merely existing, writing.

Sheila O’ Malley (Left) and Angelica Jade Bastién …Writers Supreme.

Sheila O’ Malley (Left) and Angelica Jade Bastién …Writers Supreme.




I knew nothing about writing before Angelica Jade Bastien and Sheila O'Malley. I started writing seriously maybe five years ago, first read Shiela double that amount of time on I believe Ebert's site (could've been shorter, my memory looks like a burnt out cops desk in the movies). Writing was the furthest thing (No Drake) from my mind before Angelica and Sheila... and sometimes to this day is still the furthest thing from my mind. BUT every time I read Angelica and Sheila - Masters of their craft, top of the Heap, Kings of the Hill - I'm infatuated with their writing. I'm enamored with it. In awe of, obsessed by, and intoxicated by it. I feel inferior in the presence of it, but not in that way that actually makes one feel sad, or pathetic, more like a Wayne, Garth, and Alice Cooper way. What Angelica and Sheila are able to do with words.... I don't have the words for. But they do so look, listen an read for a moment…

For The Matrix, the Wachowskis coaxed a genuinely transcendent performance from Reeves, while also successfully synthesizing a host of inspirations (from cyberpunk literature to anime classics to various strains of philosophy detailing our notions of consciousness). The results profoundly rewrote the expectations of what an action star could be. Neo’s mournful, curious gaze and joyful compulsion as he learns about the real world brought to the fore the idea that more soulful, willowy folks could carry a hidden lethality — a suggestion new to the American landscape, which often preferred its action stars’ powers conscripted to immensely muscled bodies, with true emotion either nowhere to be found or wrapped in slickly delivered sarcasm. Reeves suggested that an action star should feel, at full tilt.
— Angelica Jade Bastién "The Beatific imperfection of Keanu Reeves in The Matrix 20 years Later"

This isn’t a kerfuffle of words crashing into each other while competing for superiority of thought, no this is an A-team formed of the best an most concise word usage for the job, on a mission to re-route the discourse of our understanding of one of our greatest action stars ever. Cue the last two notes of the Mission impossible theme, which have always been in my mind a stand in for Mission accomplished “duhh daaaaaaaaa”.

It is only in the director’s cut of Aliens that we learn Ripley’s first name is “Ellen.” All business, she charges past the injured Hicks, before stopping to say in an almost hopeful tone, “See you, Hicks…” When he says, “Dwayne. It’s Dwayne,” in gigantic close-up, the subtext turns text. Weaver, caught in his gaze, in the shattering of rank, in the rise of something being acknowledged, says, without prompting, “Ellen.” Eyes glinting with flirty mischief and intimacy, he sends her off with, “Don’t be gone long, Ellen.” It’s as though they’re suddenly in bed, in a world where they could be who they want to be to each other. As father-figure to the abandoned child Newt, as husband-figure to Ripley, Hicks is essential in creating the “found family” of the reproduction-obsessed storyline of Aliens. It’s impossible to imagine the film without him.
— Sheila O' Malley "Almost Like Falling in Love"

I haven’t seen Aliens in years, but I might as well have seen it yesterday, and the way Sheila so aptly, so masterfully described what goes on in a scene that makes you feel like you knew it the whole time even though you’re just now seeing it that way because Sheila just said it…Thats her magic. I read her work, especially her scene breakdowns like this and it feels a bit like being in the room with the pre cogs of Minority Report, when they’re thoughts flash on that big screen providing insight to a scene you weren’t even sure you knew existed yet. These two don’t always write about film, both also write personal essays, and if you think either of them lose any of their magnificence in this particular arena, well…

He and I had many moments in alleys accompanied by dramatic weather:
1. Freezing black ice-drenched night. Orange light from the street lamps. Slushy, grey, cold. Scrawny prowling stray cats. We stepped from iceberg to iceberg, suddenly shy with each other in the silence. His soft voice, “Sugar, step this way.”
2. A rainy night. We sat in his parked van. Speckled fogged windshield. We drank beer, played a tape, and sang along. Harmonizing. He said later, “That was the night it started for me.”
3. Downpour. Wooden stairway. Darkness. Our first kiss. Which was actually more like a nature program on the Discovery Channel than a kiss. Biting, scratching, shoving. Each one of us struggling to grab the reins, and dominate. Kissing to kill. His hand clamped round my throat.
4. Heat wave. Muggy hot close air. We rubbed ice cubes over each other’s faces. He lifted me up, placed my feet on top of his feet, and then danced me around the alley, holding me in his arms.
5. Tornado watch. Huddled against the van, huddled against the wind. He was getting married in a week. Not to me. Standing in the massive wind, pressing our cheeks together, not talking. For once, we were not talking. No other body parts touched. My cheeks wet with tears. His cheeks were dry. But when I pulled back, the look in his dry eyes was worse than weeping.
— Sheila O' Malley "74 Facts and One Lie"
I was always an odd child, prone to health issues and anxiety. I had a nervous tic of looking at my shoes when I walked, leading me to careen into door frames and people, as if facing the world with a direct gaze was too much to bear. By then, my mother noticed that my natural oddities had given way to something darker, and my suicide attempts and musings landed me in a mental hospital just as the holiday season was in full bloom. I still can’t see Christmas lights or smell a traditional Thanksgiving dinner without my heart seizing in my chest. I was in the hospital for over a month, and by the time I left, I was not the girl I was when I entered. My mental traumas in the years following that first hospitalization grew deeper. Even though my diagnosis shifted over the years — depression, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type II — one truth remained: I have tied my identity to my madness so fiercely, I don’t know who I am when I’m not ill.
— Angelica Jade Bastién "What Crazy Ex-Girlfriend’s Depiction of Mental Illness Has Meant to Me This Season"



Did you just exhale? I did, and I’ve read each of these pieces several times. It is not ostentatious, it’s not overbearing, (though they tend to bring out emotions that feel that way) It's just there. It just exists, and in its existence you just know..." I'm not doing that" "That's not going to happen, just be happy with your mediocrity. I mean your mediocrity as compared to them.. like you're still pretty good bro, you're just not them good." Seriously they inspire me to the core, my very being as a writer. When I think of writing but I don't feel like writing, and I'm not sure of myself as a writer - I read either one of them and I'm ready to ride again, and I love them for it. So this is just a thank you note, before I forget saying thank you because the quagmire of my own tangential life found it's way to my living room again , or met me at the front entrance of my job. Art matters, and what these two women do in expressing their love for others art is art, and in that expression I feel seen. Even when I COMPLETELY disagree, or have no idea what the fuck they're talking about (they read alot , I well ...don't). In that expression of love I feel challenged, and fulfilled, and amazed. They're much better looking Burgess Meredith's from Rocky, in my corner, spewing out paragraphs instead of profanities as inspiration. Their words are Johnny Gill’s parts in “N.E. Heartbreak” revving me up, emphatically warning me to “I better be ready”. I've never met either, physically, but my appreciation for them is intense. If I prayed much anymore, or as much as I'd liked to, I'd pray for them everyday to be granted a 1up if ever their number was called as a personal favor to the world. So ...I'm back writing now, it feels good..for now, and oh yeah here’s more Johnny Gill espousing my exact feelings on these women’s words. ..

So good My, My, My Listen Put on your red dress And slip on your high heels And some of that sweet perfume It sure smells good on you Slide on your lipstick Let your hair down Cause Baby when you get through Im going to show you Tonight will