Delroy Lindo Sets Black Masculinity Ablaze and Then Shows Us Redemption in “Da Five Bloods"

delroy-lindo-monologue-da-5-bloods.jpg

It’s an incredibly difficult balancing act telling a story centered around Vietnam vets, that does not cater to propaganda about the military industrial complex and patriotism, that is honest in its portrayal of various forms of racism traded back and forth between different oppressed people's being used as tools against one another, and that offers a unique version of black masculinity that is so much freer from the normal rigid portrayals of black men from this time, but Spike Lee has done it in his Latest “Da 5 Bloods” and its central spigot is the performance put forth by veteran actor Delroy Lindo. Lindo's performance is a full bodied reckoning with black male masculinity and trauma that finds so many vibrant, symphonic, movements and sounds it’s easy to compare it to one of the great classical symphonies, or better yet, the masterful compositions of Quincy Jones as pain and release. It is performative jazz, with a clear intention and racing improvisation along the way. It’s all to tell us a story about a man we may all be familiar with, just not this intimately. He gives us a backstory to the folk we have come to despise relaying a tragic sorrow to the men we’ve lost to racism and patriarchy.

film-review-da-5-bloods-delroy-lindo-as-paul-and-jonathan-majors-as-david.png

In the beginning it’s not made instantly apparent, ( but damn near) that Lindo's Paul is a shell of a man, much like so many mortars left behind in a war he was conscripted to fight in, on behalf of a country that never loved him, or his people. There came a point in the movie when he says “We fought in an immoral war that wasn't ours for rights that weren't ours”, and I thought “this is kind of the underscore of this movie”, the ghost around which this shell is wrapped. They are powerful words that speak every bit as much to Paul's inciting incident of trauma as does another poignant scene involving forgiveness. Lindo in every way sevices this role with an intelligence, an almost prophetic fire , and an intensity and emotional sincerity that governs his every move. Paul is a Volcano. A rock of a man, who refuses to move from the birthplace of his harm, filled with burning resentment that explodes in repeating intervals making it hard to be around him. Lindo adds features that further explore his bodily agitation and mental unrest as it appears on his body. There's constant shifts in his weight, his mood, and even the wrinkles in his face. His voice trembles, he seems to be reaching for his breath on occasions where he has been triggered, and the script and Lindo work together to let us know this is because he is repressing, and by the time the movie nears its end we will find out exactly what it is he's been holding. His clueing us in is important because even if subconsciously, it validates the experience. The great Arthur Lessac - the famed voice and body coach created his “Lessac Method” to show the connection between the body, the voice, and health, which in turn can also be used to show a lack of it. Changes in the potency of ones vocals or movements, or the ways in which they radiate can suggest to an audience exactly what's going on physically or mentally with a character in a way that doesn’t constitute “acting” because accessing that particular wavelength informs our bodies as what to do. It’s very funny how tapping into a certain action will bring you to an emotion. Sanford Meisner (Another extremely famous acting teacher) devised a technique that might involve banging your fist to find anger, in Lessacs case, quivering ones body would not only inform the audience of your frailty, but you of your own. Lindo whether through training or not seems to understand in ways very few actors can or have these concepts, and deploys them profoundly.

Casio-MTF-E002B-1AVCF-Chronograph-Watch-of-Delroy-Lindo-as-Paul-in-Da-5-Bloods-Movie-1~2.jpg

Later when we see Paul at a bar with Eddie (Clarke Peters) Paul will allude to this pending reveal in the movie again speaking to the fact that “his pain is different”. As he thinks on it Lindo covers his mouth, (again repression) he almost cries, but he holds it in, he says “I Saw him die”. We don't know yet what it is, how it is, what that is, we allow it stand on its own, because it stands to reason considering. He closes his eyes, it’s coming again, he wrinkles his mouth to one side, contorts his face round the left eye to fight it back, swigs his beer and its gone... the bucket is sent back down to the well.

processed_20200615_202441.jpg

What Paul carries is the same water many black men carry, and have carried, and more importantly he carries it how most black men carry it. It can be said that while black women carry burdens alone because they have to, and in many ways are left with no other choice, black men carry burdens alone voluntarily under the belief that they want or need to, informed by their sturdy belief and not-so well hidden admiration for white patriarchal power. In that way Lindo’s Paul transcends the screen and reminds us of the pain we inflict upon ourselves and those closest to us, by not even reconciling with our own trauma.

The wounded child inside many males is a boy who when he first spoke his truths was silenced by paternal sadism by a patriarchal world that did not want him to claim his true feelings - bell hooks

Later on in the film, after yet another explosion- Paul rebukes his own child for a perceived betrayal, the trauma continues to be generational. Much of what forms and constitites Paul’s anger is betrayal - betrayal by people, a country ,and ultimately life, and he passes this down, and around to those who love him most. Paul heads off on his own, as he moves on further into this breakage and into the foliage of the jungle, he begins to scream, we don’t realize it yet, in fact it seems as though he's only diving deeper down regressing into a manic state of cantankerous madness the pinnacle of which Lindo explores with the kinetic genius of Dizzy Gillespie, and the focused intensity of Denzel - but we are being fooled by our own bias, he's beginning to break, and as Tom Cruise's Jerry Maguire once said in the titular film, “Breakdown - Breakthrough”.

processed_20200615_202949.jpg

Not always, but on occasion when the breakage is deep enough, on the other side of a breakdown is a breakthrough. Lindo's primordial yells are spiritual in nature, and they are painful, and representative of his need to let it it all out, but still he is holding back, still he is holding on, and I’ve heard very few things like it. It’s as if someone merged the spiritual energy of Robert Mitchum singing “Leaning on the Everlasting Arms” in Night of the Hunter, and the purging menace of Deniro speaking in tongues in Martin Scorcese's Cape Fear..

Paul finds redemption in the form of accountability through literally facing his ghost. He was infected with poison, the poison of betrayal and grief, and finally it’s being sucked out. Lindo himself speaks of the fact that he informed Paul's ideas, his very traits with this exact intention and purpose, with this poisom. In an interview with “The Daily Beast” he says..

In the process of creating a biography for Paul I also placed in a number of other personal betrayals so we have the large betrayal of the country and the culture and then we have the betrayals that I had suffered- the loss of my wife, the loss of my son. When I say the loss of my son, I mean the fact that the relationship is as fractious as it is. That constitutes a loss, because I cannot interact with my son and express the love that I have for my son in the way that I would like so those are two very, very deep-seated losses

Creating an actor biography ( a backstory beyond the script) is indicative of training for actors, it has a long history and it's a powerful factor in deepening the connection between actor and role. But Lindo’s intellectual approach to this particular character also showed a understanding of the common attributes that plague black men in our society (especially one of his generation) and that connection not only deepens our connection to him through our own experiences or our understanding of the experience- but also deepens our understanding of the character. Paul is a rusted relic of a war not only waged by a country to another country, but also by country on its own peoples. Like so many of those landmines left in Vietnam he too was left there, and also like them, once triggered he's bound to explode. This explosion reaches out beyond the screen and spreads emotional shrapnel onto any audience member viewing it. Touching them, hurting them, triggering them, but at the highest moment, the very peak moment of the performance it provides us with secondary emotional catharsis through the journey of redemption that Lindo brings us all on through a number of minutiae and larger performative activities that remind us of Lindo’s genius, and our own struggles for emotional and physical freedom from a world that hates us, and more importantly from ourselves. When the movie ends we find that in fact it is only beginning, and Lindo is where we are all at, or at least where we need to see ourselves at. The entrance and intrinsic change that starts with accountability and taking down the ghosts of our collective and individual pasts. Once more bell hooks..

For me forgiveness and compassion are always linked: how do we hold people accountable for wrongdoing and yet at the same time remain in touch with their Humanity enough to believe in their capacity to be transformed?

Robert Pattinson Imagined something far outside the Paradigm in Netflix's The King

the-king-trailer-27aug19-05.jpg

I measured Robert Pattinson's performance in the Timothee Chalamet vehicle "THE KING" not by good, great, or bad, but by it's willingness to border all three. I don't know what to make of his accent. His posturing, and histrionics could be viewed as overacting, and yet is that not a fair assessment of the intention? Is the dauphin not meant to be a wannabe? A boy posturing as a man, as a killer, as a leader? The film sure does spend a lot of time speaking explicitly and implicitly about the difference. About growth, and stunted growth. Disfigured growth caused by outside interference. In most storytelling especially that of a western tilt , the hero must have a mirror image, the villain, someone who is almost exactly the same except less. Usually by way of depth of journey. Where a hero continues to grow beyond, a villain simply stops, remaining undeveloped, repeating similar tactics and schemes meant to undermine the hero, but also to mask their own willful defiance of their own inadequacy. Is the dauphin not such a man. A grand fool, who spends a great deal of his screen time trying to prove the same in his chosen adversary. Pattinson brings this to life in ways both organic to his own artifice, and in ways that portray his craft. His posture is a bit stunted. He sits and stands as if their is a hump on his back, huddled under the weight of his insecurities. His opening scene has the energy of a child; the fingers tapping on the box, the poor posture in his chair, the robes seem almost too much for him. He jostles about in his seat, it is Impertinent, impatient, giddy, and mischievous.

Screenshot_20191104-080124_Chrome~2.jpg
Screenshot_20191104-075814_Chrome~2.jpg

His performance is uneven, slightly off kilter, like his accent falls and it rises, it fails and it succeeds, it's silly, and it is deadly serious. The great actor and coach Uta Hagen highly respected imagination in an actor, she thought it one of the most important tools in our box, but I don't know that collectively we respect it as much as we should. We have arrived in an age of acting closer to Hagen's version of acting than that of Stanislavski or Adler, but it lacks one of her core tenants imagination . Which is funny because with so many actors in roles that live outside the realm of reality, playing captains of America, and strong men who can pull down helicopters by the will of their biceps it's very sad and somewhat tragic that their imagination does not reach the heights of their play, and their surroundings. Here though is Pattinson, creating something altogether unrecognizable. Something we are not used to seeing in this age, or in the way most actors play people from it . Something that pierces the boundaries of our collective perception of what the performance of a persona from that time feels like. It stands out from the rest of the film because everyone else is so clearly displaying more of a regard for that time. No doubt Michod's film is a lot more modern a take than usual, and its historical reverence has a lot more in common with Sophia Coppola's Marie Antoinette than it may seem on its face, but Pattinson's performance is not merely modern it's outrageous. Precisely what we need more of in acting. The unsure, the unsettled, the ridiculous, the unmitigated gall to REACH dammit! Knowing full well that you will come well short while in the presence of an entire audience. To that I say Bravo Robert, encore Robert, ENCORE.

Wesley Snipes May be Back and it's About Damn Time

download.jpeg

In the words of many a rap bar “once again it's on!” Wesley Snipes is finally back, and of course it took someone black and of course it was Eddie Murphy. As I wrote before, Murphy has had a long career of using his own dream movies and cache to bridge generations of talent and he is back at it again in his latest "Dolemite is My Name". The film sets out to pay homage to spirit of Rudy Ray Moore, by way of continuous themes of persistence, crude humor, and camp, and it succeeds largely because everyone is so clear on what it is they're doing. No one more -so than Snipes. The actor with the most bonafides on set dived the most headlong into the spirit of this film creating a character that is less a practice in exactitude, and more in essence of not only D'Urville Martin, but the movie and the times. It's something that is apparent from the his opening scene in the movie. Murphy's Rudy Ray Moore seeks to hire D'Urville as an actor in his movie , and as the movie goes D'Urville is as large in his own mind as the people he has worked with. The performance is recognizable as an outrageous adaptation of the trope of the egotistical actor, as well as an amalgamation of characters from blaxploitation films like “The Mack” , black stock characters like Antonio Fargas, the largeness of a Frederich March, and even a bit of W.C. Fields.

Dolemite shows us his acting and kung-fu chops. #Dolemite #EddieMurphy #WesleySnipes 📺: Netflix ⚠️: I don't own or stream this show. Just a fan of it!




What Snipes's opening scene and beyond moved me to feel is both profound happiness for the loud rediscovery of Wesley Snipes, and continued rebuke for the quietly tragic loss of he and so many other large black talents to a Hollywood that refused to let them be seen. To realise what or why it is that I feel that Snipes has been dealt a lesser hand, (though not altogether bad), you have to go back to the role that made him, but should've MADE him. Wesley had been around in Michael Jackson’s “Bad” video, (the one time he would work with any true white Autuer in Scorcese) on major TV shows like Miami Vice, and in films like Major League, and King of New York, but he broke out in Mario Van Peebles searingly fatalistic crime ballad “New Jack City” as Nino Brown. As breakthrough performances go it's better is difficult to find. Snipes was imprinted on every square inch of the reel, his barbarous magnetism served as the centrifugal force of the movies pull. Every word every line, every look, movement, step was a defining criterion for Nino's explosive temper, alpha male presentation of masculinity, and his omnipresent charisma. It's in the way he eats a banana while dismissively listening to a soon to be rival explain to him how disrespectful his latest move is to the Italians..

Screenshot_20191104-134446_Chrome.jpg

It’s in profound moments of inner conflict, and tightly guarded vulnerability, like when he decides to kill close friend G-money, holding back tears he can’t stop, clinching and reclinching Gee to his chest as if to get just one last feel for his brother in arms before doing what he feels is the only way out for him continuing his path of ruthless self survival by murdering his own supposed brother (which would be his worst act if not for using a child as a human shield) it's a kind of depraved self control and victimhood…

Screenshot_20191104-135820_Chrome.jpg

And finally, it’s most certainly in the centerpiece scene of the movie when he interrogates his entire team over a recent infiltration of the Carter building ( he himself ruthlessly commandeered) by the police. Snipes enters the room with that kind of rare screen presence occupied by some of our greatest acting talents, Brando, Hepburn, Rowlands, Redgrave, Pacino. He’s in full possession of that certain je ne sais quoi that makes so many people loving, fearing, hating, and pledging fealty feel completely possible because we the audience go along for the ride and end up doing much of the same. There are moments of trained elegance, like the scenes final moment when Snipes utters “Now..leave me” and of slick rambunctious improvisation like when he jumps rope over his dog chain…all of it is brilliant...

Uploaded by movies cilp on 2019-05-25.

Snipes and the scene itself compare favorably to another film about Cops and Gangsters; DePalma’s “The Untouchables”. In its infamous “Baseball” scene Robert Deniro is Al Capone heading up a dinner meeting with various associates of his empire. Both scenes are constructed such as the spend a great deal of time on the actor, the set up is similar, and a shocking bit of violence occurs, but, how they arrive there is different...

The Untouchables movie clips: http://j.mp/1BcPG9X BUY THE MOVIE: http://amzn.to/sW4EVr Don't miss the HOTTEST NEW TRAILERS: http://bit.ly/1u2y6pr CLIP DESCRIPTION: Capone's (Robert De Niro) baseball metaphor ends badly for one gangster.

What’s different is how much in each scene the set-up leaves for the actor . In The Untocuhables the setting seems congenial, setting up the surprise. In New Jack City, the mood is already ominous, lessening the surprise element if not curtailing it altogether. Each one brings its own unique power, but New Jack is asking more of its actor. Both have the job of making a sudden act of violence feel authentic, but one has the storytelling element of surprise already behind them, the other (Snipes) has to convince us of the expected being unexpected as well.

Screen Shot 2019-11-04 at 3.36.26 PM.png




A breakout performance like this comes every once in a blue moon, and usually it garners a shipload of attention, rave reviews, at least some Oscar attention, as well as a step into the big leagues. For Wesley Snipes it meant a strange purgatory of near A list ability and stardom, with B- movie projects, save for White Men can’t jump, and a couple Spike Lee films right up until he and Marvel teamed up to make Blade. Yet as influential as two of those films were, as much money as they made, and as singular as Snipes was in the role of Blade, for that period and after it was the only thing he had going. Snipes like Angela Bassett, and Don Cheadle was a victim of a rigid and unimaginative Hollywood that exit today more-so in its storytelling than its its racial make-up which is rapidly changing (while still having a long way to go). The big heavy coveted roles were for majority of white people, the black ones to Denzel, and everyone else had to fight amongst the scraps. Fortunately for Wesley plenty of black filmmakers existed in the 90’s but when the need for “black films” went out so too did many of Wesley’s opportunities. And now some 6 years after his release from prison for tax evasion (insert eye roll here) Snipes is finally back on the scene, being rightfully awashed in praise for being at least one of the best things about this movie. After all these years of watching Snipes be excellent in nearly everything he does from New Jack, to better than given credit for action films like Drop Zone, to To Wong Foo, Sugar Hill, and more, I am ecstatic about a possible return for Snipes, and all the possibilities for him in this new space. Eddie Murphy himself is at the beginning of his own comeback as well, and rightfully that has been huge news, but I wouldn't want anyone to forget the level of talent Snipes is, and what roles in Indies, comic book films, action films, horror, and as we can see comedy would look like with Snipes. For autuers like Barry , Ava, Coogler, Rees, Taika Waititi, Kathryn Bigelow, Winding- Refn, Kasuma, and more to take a second look at what he has done, and realise what he can add to a production. To these possibilities, and to this return (Coming to America pt 2 included) all I can say with apprehension and caution as to whether this will lead to a proper resurgence is “It’s about damn time”